Dil Chahta Hai@25: 'Didn't Know We Were Making a Cult Film'

 

Sanchita Chatterjee, BS News Agency: Farhan Akhtar's directorial debut, Dil Chahta Hai, which released 25 years ago, redefined male bonding in Hindi cinema, moving away from the traditional macho template to offer a refreshing and breezy take on friendship, becoming a timeless classic.

Key Points

  • Released on August 10, 2001, Dil Chahta Hai marked Farhan Akhtar's directorial debut and redefined male bonding in mainstream Hindi cinema.
  • The film, starring Aamir Khan, Akshaye Khanna, and Saif Ali Khan, explored the complexities of friendship among three men with distinct approaches to life and love.
  • Cinematographer Ravi K Chandran chose Dil Chahta Hai over Devdas, aiming for a 'real, modern, and young' visual style, particularly evident in the iconic Goa sequences.

·         

·      Twenty-five years ago, three young men changed the macho template that was till then the staple of Hindi cinema to give us Dil Chahta Hai, a refreshing, breezy take on male bonding not centred on romance.

·        Farhan Akhtar was only 27 when he made his directorial debut with the film that released on August 10, 2001.

·        The film, the first project of Farhan and his friend Ritesh Sidhwani's production banner Excel Entertainment, stars Aamir Khan, Akshaye Khanna, Saif Ali Khan, Preity Zinta, Dimple Kapadia and Sonali Kulkarni.


·    'It had universal appeal, unlike those films which appealed more to NRIs than to Indians'

·        At its heart is the friendship between the three men who approach life and love in markedly different ways -- Akash, cynical and commitment-averse, Sameer, wearing his heart on his sleeve, and Sid, the introspective artist who channels his emotions into his work and his relationship with an older woman.



·        Their differences gave the friendship its texture, allowing the film to explore not just the joy of being young but also the inevitable friction that comes when friends begin choosing different paths.

·        "It had universal appeal, unlike those films which appealed more to NRIs than to Indians. You know, the common Indian, even if he was urban, could relate to the characters, the situations, the way the film was presented, the music, the lyrics, and the looks," film historian S M M Ausaja tells.



·        He views the film as path-breaking film for several reasons.

·        "Everything had a novelty value and a relatability with the audience. So that connection has continued because the basic elements of emotion were intact… the look, the feel, and the styling were different-and refreshingly different."